The Telegraph – Debt crisis and Greek bond swap: live

March 9, 2012 in PLF News

By Martin Strydom

The Greek government says 85.8pc of bondholders have accepted bond swap offer, moving the country closer to another much-needed bail-out, and this will rise to 95.7pc with the use of collective action clauses to enforce the deal.

Latest

08.00 FTSE 100 opens down 2 points – or 0.05pc – to 5856.72

07.40 Stefanos Manos, a former Greek minister, told Bloomberg TV why the debt swap is good for Greece, but maybe not the EU:

QuoteGreece faces fewer interest payments. We got a reprieve. Whether it is good for Europe I have my doubts.

While Greek Government spokesman Pantelis Kapsis said the result was a “vote of confidence” in Greece’s ability to carry out deep structural reforms to its stricken economy.

QuoteI think it’s a historic moment.

07.35 The yield on Italian and Spanish 10-year bonds have dipped after the bond swap as contagion fears recede. The yields are now 4.75pc and 4.98p.

It looks like the debt deal has been priced in.

07.30 Greece may have avoided a messy default but many commentators remain worried about its prospects. Some are sceptical of the assumption used to calculated the benefits for Greek debts from thebond swap. The economy has weakened further since then and youth unemployment is now above 51pc.

Michael Kemmer, general manager of German bank association BdB, told Bloomberg:

QuoteWe can’t think that Greece is saved and the crisis is over. This is an important step – the private sector showed solidarity. That’s good, but the work has only just begun.

Despite all the justified happiness about this issue we have to note that Greece is only buying time with this and has to do its homework and pursue budget consolidation, savings and its privatisation programme.

07.20 Fears of a CDS payout has triggered selling of the euro. We’ll know more later today:

07.00 Asian markets rose, with Tokyo’s Nikkei rising 1.65pc to close at it highest level in more than seven months on optimism over a Greek debt deal. At one stage it rose above 10,000 mark for the first time since August 1.

Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 0,9pc, South Korea’s Kospi gained 0.88pc, and Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 added 1pc.

Markets on the Continent are expected to extend yeterday’s gains when they open in around a hour’s time. Although financial spread-betters say the FTSE 100 could open around 3-4 points, or 0.1pc, lower, pausing for a breath after strong gains in the previous session as investors seek direction from US jobs data this afternoon.

06.45 The French finance minister says the bond swap is good nes and avoids default risk.

Reuters reports that Francois Baroin told RTL radio:

QuoteIt’s good news, its a good success. It’s something that allows us to stay on a voluntary basis that avoids the risk of default.

He said he also had confidence in the Spanish government’s ability to resolve its large deficit pile.

06.40 The euro fell against the before the announcement and then picked up:

Euro edges higher after the news the 85.8pc of bondholders accepted the bond swap. Graph: Bloomberg

06.30 Here’s a flavour of how those in the market view the deal:

NG KIAN TECK, SIAS RESEARCH, SINGAPORE

QuoteThe question now is what will happen to all the credit default swaps in the market. This is what people want to know – is this considered a default, and if it is, who are the winners and losers? We don’t know who the losers are now and they can be quite a substantial amount because the CDS float is not small.”

YUJI SAITO, CREDIT AGRICOLE, TOKYO

QuoteThe headlines from Greece are within expectations and the market reaction (euro selling) is a classic case of buy the rumour, sell the fact.

SURESH KUMAR RAMANATHAN, CIMB INVESTMENT BANK, KUALA LUMPUR

QuoteWe have been warning for the past 2 months that Greece will collapse and that collapse is beginning to play out currently. If ISDA sees the activation of CACs as a credit event, then we have an official sign of a default in Greece. For markets, it will be vital to gauge how much of CDS will be triggered following the activation of CACs. We are likely to see some synchronization of equities, cross currency swap basis in EUR/USD and peripheral bonds and CDS all facing a sell off.

06.22 Josef Ackerman, the respected German banker and chairman of the Institute of International Finance, which helped broker the bond swap for private investors, said the debt deal will help contribute to restroring stability in the eurozone, Bloomberg reports. It quotes him saying:

QuoteThe very strong and positive result provides a major opportunity now for Greece to move ahead with its economic reform program, while strengthening the euro area’s ability to create an economic environment of stability and growth.

The successful completion of the debt exchange will contribute meaningfully to facilitating the official financing for Greece and help Greece to carry out necessary reforms to set the basis for economic recovery. These are important steps towards resolving the Greek debt crisis, addressing the overall fiscal and sovereign debt problems in the euro area, and restoring financial stability, which is essential to foster economic growth and job creation.

06.20 Greek Finance Minister Evangelos Venizelos, calling the swap an “historic event”, in extending its offer to private creditiors holding bonds not governed by Greek law to March 23, warned:

QuoteThere will be no further opportunity for creditors holding those instruments to benefit from the package of ESFS notes, co-financing and GDP linked securities, which formed an important and intergral part of our invitations.

06.15 If a credit event is declared it will create even more uncertainty.

06.10 The Greeks may be happy, but its now universal.

06.09 The International Swaps and Derivatives Association will now meet at 1pm today to decide it the use of Collective Action Clauses constitutes a credit event. If it decides whether Greece has officially defaulted CDSs – insurance against default – will be triggered.

Philip Shaw, economist at Investec, says:

OpinionThe use of the CACs would make it more difficult to argue that this is not a credit event, thereby triggering a CDS payout. However this is not necessarily the catastrophe that many fear. The net exposure to Greek CDSs is relatively small at $3.2bn and one could argue that making sovereign debt insurable after all, could be a positive development.

06.05 The deadline for acceptance of the offer for bonds governed by international law and for state-guaranteed bonds issued by public companies has been extended to March 23.

06.03 Participation in the bond swap will rise to 95.7pc after Greece triggers Collective Action Clauses on those who did not accept to offer, which will forces investors to take loss of as much as 74pc..

06.02 Greece says €172bn of bond were tendered in bond swap. Greece says 69pc of non-Greek bond holders participated and the country says it has received tenders for €152bn under Greek law.

06.00 Breaking …

The Greek government says 85.8pc of bondholders have accepted bond swap offer

05.59 For a bit of background on the Greek debt swap before we get the results it’s worth looking at Louise Armitstead’s story, Greece in last ditch scramble to avoid default.

05.58 Good morning and welcome back to our live coverage of the eurozone debt crisis. The main story today will be the Greek debt swap, with news expected soon on how many investors willingly agreed to take a haircut before the 8pm deadline last night. We’re expecting preliminary results any minute now, as well as a press conference from Evangelos Venizelos in Athens at 11am GMT.

News Link

BBC – ‘Europe is poor so should live within its means’

February 8, 2012 in Articles, Speeches, Spotlight, Tun Dr. Mahathir

February 7, 2012 | By Justin Rowlatt

For decades the West has lectured the East on how to manage its economies. Not any more.

Now the emerging economies of Asia look like models of steady, consistent policy and sustained growth while Europe, America and Japan are mired in debt and are growing achingly slowly, if at all.

So what can the West learn from the East?

According to former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, the message is simple but devastating: Europe must face up to the new economic reality.

“Europe… has lost a lot of money and therefore you must be poor now relative to the past,” he reasons in an interview with BBC World Service’s Business Daily.

“And in Asia we live within our means. So when we are poor, we live as poor people. I think that is a lesson that Europe can learn from Asia.”

State of denial

Dr Mahathir is well qualified to pass judgement.

If any Asian leader can make claim to having laid the groundwork for his country’s economic expansion, it is he.

During his two decades in power, Dr Mahathir helped transform Malaysia from a sleepy former colony into an economic tiger.

But his advice will not make happy reading in the capitals of Europe.

Dr Mahathir believes European leaders are in a state of denial.

You refuse to acknowledge you have lost money and therefore you are poor,” he says.

“And you can’t remedy that by printing money. Money is not something you just print. It must be backed by something, either good economy or gold.”

Dr Mahathir may be 86 years old, but he still holds very strong views.

In particular, he believes Europe and the West must begin the long slow process of restructuring their economies to reduce their dependence on the financial sector.

“I think you should go back to doing what I call real business – producing goods, providing services, trading – not just moving figures in bank books, which is what you are doing.”

His big bugbear is still currency trading, which he believes did huge damage to the Malaysian economy during the financial crisis that hit Asia in the late 1990s.

“Currency is not a commodity”, he says.

“You sell coffee. Coffee… can be ground and made into a cup of coffee.

“But currency, you cannot grind it and make it into anything. It is just figures in the books of the banks and you can trade with figures in the books of banks only.

“There must be something solid to trade, then you can legitimately make money.”

Tough message

But even if Europe takes his advice, Dr Mahathir believes there will be no quick return to economic health.

“To recover your wealth you have to work over many years to rebuild your capacities, to produce goods and services to sell to the world, to compete with the eastern countries,” he says.

European workers are overpaid and unproductive, Dr Mahathir believes.

“I think you have paid your workers far too much money for much less work,” he says.

“So you cannot expect to live at this level of wealth when you are not producing anything that is marketable.”

His message is tough, he acknowledges, before adding with a laugh: “We used to get tough messages from you before, remember?”

“And now, what is the result? Sometimes you undermined our currency and we became very poor. Well, we learn from each other. We were Euro-centric before. I think it should be a little bit Asia-centric now.”

A tough message indeed.

News Link

NYT – European Leaders Agree to New Budget Discipline Measures

January 31, 2012 in Articles, Spotlight

President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany and Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti in Brussels

January 30, 2012 | By  and 

BRUSSELS — All but two European Union countries agreed Monday to new and tougher measures to enforce budget discipline in the euro zone, but the bloc still showed few signs of producing a comprehensive solution for the sovereign debt crisis or a credible plan to revive fragile economies across Europe’s weakened Mediterranean tier.

The meeting of 27 European Union heads of state and government here in Brussels was aimed at completing the text of a so-called fiscal compact for the 17 nations relying on or intending to join the euro zone — with only Britain and the Czech Republic opting not to adopt the measures.

After a meeting lasting seven hours, the leaders also issued a declaration calling for a new push to restart growth and combat joblessness across the Continent.

But a number of politicians and analysts said the pledge by the European leaders to create new jobs was mostly empty, and others complained that the proposed rules to keep deficits under control contained little to actually help nations with high borrowing costs.

The summit declaration also skirted the continuing problems in Greece, where a second bailout is being held up by the inability of the government in Athens to complete a deal with private holders of Greek bonds over the losses they should accept.

Until Athens and its private-sector creditors can agree on a $132 billion writedown on Greek government debt, the International Monetary Fund and the European Union are not prepared to sign off on a further bailout. Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany said the Greek situation would not be addressed until after representatives of Greece’s so-called troika of creditors — the European Union, the I.M.F. and the European Central Bank — report back on their investigation into what will be needed for Greece to manage its finances on its own.

Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, told a news conference at the end of the summit that there would be a “definitive agreement” on the private sector’s involvement in reducing Greek debt in coming days. After Monday night’s summit meeting, informal talks continued between the Greek prime minister, Lucas Papademos, and European officials.

Despite the various other problems to deal with, an agreement on the fiscal compact could clear the way for Germany to accept stronger efforts by the European Central Bank to support ailing countries and a more comprehensive bailout fund aimed at protecting Italy and Spain against the risk of default.

“It is an important step forward to a stability union,” Mrs. Merkel told reporters. “For those looking at the union and the euro from the outside, it is a very important to show this commitment.” Britain, which clashed openly with France and Germany last month over the pact, did not give any ground Monday and was joined by the Czech Republic, which also elected to stay outside.

“We are not signing this treaty,” David Cameron, the British prime minister, said. “We are not ratifying it. And it places no obligations” on the United Kingdom, he said.

He added: “Our national interest is that these countries get on and sort out the mess that is the euro.”

Mr. Sarkozy sounded philosophical about the Britons’ intransigence. “There are different degrees of integration and everyone is free to choose where they stand,” he said.

While European leaders agreed to bring a permanent bailout fund into existence earlier than previously foreseen, they postponed any final decisions on its ultimate size and how it will be financed. The International Monetary Fund has been pressing Europe to commit enough money to provide a credible backstop that would insure that Italy and Spain could pay their bills and continue to finance their debts.

Germany backed away from a suggestion that it wanted the government in Athens to cede temporarily control over tax and spending decisions to a new, all-powerful, budget commissioner before it can secure further bailouts. Italy won its battle to restrict the scope of the fiscal compact, which calls for making it easier to impose sanctions against countries that break European Union budget rules. The text said the compact would make it harder to block sanctions against countries that exceed annual deficit targets but that the same tough system would not apply to nations with excessive overall debt, like Italy.

The compact will come into force in those nations that agree to its terms once 12 euro zone nations have ratified it. That would prevent the project being held up if one or two nations hold referendums on the deal.

Still, impatience with the German focus on belt-tightening loomed large over the summit meeting.

“You don’t have to be an economics professor to know that if you have zero growth you are not going to sort things out,” said Martin Schulz, the president of the European Parliament. Critics of austerity point to Greece, which is being strangled by a vicious cycle of deficit cutting, declining tax revenues and more budget cutting, while making little if any progress on its overall budget deficit.

Guy Verhofstadt, leader of the centrist liberal and democrat group, and a former prime minister of Belgium, took a similar stand.

“The new agreement consolidates fiscal discipline but omits completely to address the other side of the coin — that of solidarity and investment that will create jobs and growth,” Mr. Verhofstadt said. “E.U. leaders should act instead of producing more paper.”

News Link

The Edge – Prospects for the Malaysian Economy in 2012

January 12, 2012 in Articles, Spotlight

*Image from forum.globaltimes.cn

January 9, 2012 | By The Edge Malaysia Weekly

Recent high-frequency global data is suggesting that forces from external headwinds cannot be underestimated. Events unfolding in the European economies have heightened risk aversion, exerting downward pressure on the real economies of Asia via weaker demand for Asian exports and, more importantly, destabilising the outflow of capital. As a consequence, business sentiment will erode while the external sector’s sluggishness will reverberate across regional economies.

The offsetting force, however, is the macro picture of the US economy, which is looking decidedly more upbeat in recent months. Although growth was revised to a sub par 1.8% (from 2%) in 3Q2011, manufacturing activity has improved, as evidenced by a steady rise in the Institute of Supply Management (ISM) new orders component.

New jobless claims have also continued to slide despite the relatively loose labour market with an unemployment rate of 8.6%.Investments are also gaining momentum, judging by the double-digit expansion in the equipment and software (E&S) sector in recent quarters.

In our base-case scenario, we foresee the ISM new orders gauge hovering at around 50 to 55 points in 2012. With such a moderate outlook, our gross exports will likely expand at a slower pace of 3% and 6% (Chart 1). Given this scenario, we anticipate industrial production to grow by between 1.5% and 3.5%.

An examination of manufacturing sale statistics also suggests that the expected increase in sales by 6% to 8% in 2012 will lead to a likely growth in Malaysian industrial production that is within our projected range of 1.5% to 3.5%.

When another mapping exercise is done using the growth rates of the composite Export-IPI indicator (which we define as a simple summation of export and industrial production index growth) and gross domestic product (GDP), we arrive at a possible GDP growth range of 4% to 4.8% for 2012.

The expected performance of the equity market is also taken into consideration as the benchmark FTSE Bursa Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI) provides a relatively good picture of future GDP growth trends.

By examining the general outlook of the equity market for 2012 and coupling it with other macro indicators, we arrive at a possible range of GDP growth through proper weightages

Based on these indicators, we envisage the economy to expand by between 3.8% and 5% in 2012. Taking the mid-point of the range, we pencilled in our GDP projection of 4.4% for 2012.

Private consumption – still our greatest hope

Consumers will continue to support the economy with their spending, although their sentiment may be slightly dented by weak financial market performance and measures undertaken by Bank Negara Malaysia to put a lid on domestic household debt.

Thus, we anticipate private consumption to grow by 6.4% in 2012 on account of the relatively steady labour market despite the fragility of the manufacturing sector, the feel-good factor brought about by the government’s plan to upgrade the salary scale of civil servants in 2012 and the still relatively easy access to credit through bank lending to the household sector.

The last factor is crucial in supporting consumer spending patterns, although Bank Negara recently tightened financial institutions’ guidelines for lending (such as using net income to determine eligibility for loans and imposing an amount of credit extended by credit cards to cardholders with income levels of less than RM3,000 per month).

This is due to the fact that banks will continue to target households in their drive to expand loan growth and will therefore make extra efforts to reach out to more eligible borrowers while non-financial institutions like cooperatives will continue to lure civil servants to take up as much credit as they possibly can.

Private investment – not a short-term remedy

While the government is banking on the momentum of private investment to invigorate the economy in 2012, a persistent rise in risk aversion among investors following shaky global economic prospects may somewhat dampen investor enthusiasm. Thus, the pace of foreign direct investment (FDI) flows into the region (including Malaysia) will likely soften from their levels in 2011. The weakening of global FDI flows will also affect cross-border mergers and acquisitions, leading to slower growth in private investment.

Nevertheless, an encouraging offsetting effect is provided by none other than the respectable momentum of the Economic Transformation Programme (ETP) projects, which may have pushed private investments up by a double-digit pace in 2011, a phenomenon that we have rarely seen in the past decade. As of November 2011, about 53% of the 131 targeted Entry Point Projects (EPPs) had taken off. Of the total value of RM171 billion in committed investments, about RM10 billion had been realised and another RM5 billion is expected to have been realised by the end of 2011.

Notwithstanding the success of the ETP, private investment will not likely be able to carry the economy through the turbulent waters of 2012 due to its relatively small share of GDP (about 11% in 2010). While the spill over effects from private investment may trickle through the economy via a stronger construction sector (and hence service sector), the adverse effects of the external sector will likely overshadow such positive effects. Thus, we foresee private investment expanding at a slower pace of 9% in 2012 compared with the government’s forecast of 15.9%.

Headline inflation – not a major concern

Asian economies, including Malaysia, will likely see a more benign inflation environment in 2012 based on the dim growth scenario painted above. For Malaysia, we opine that the headline number has responded to both demand-pull and cost-push pressures in the past few months, causing the rate to remain above 3% for some time.

A vibrant consumer sector following stable labour market conditions, coupled with the rising cost of raw materials, have led to persistent increments in food prices. Indeed, since July 2007, when civil servants last received a broad-based salary revision, prices of food and non-alcoholic beverages have escalated by 23.9% while the headline Consumer Price Index (CPI) has risen by 12.3%

Moving forward, we do not see a significant increase in Malaysia’s CPI, although food prices will remain a thorny issue despite a possible moderation in the Food and Beverage Index as indicated by a decline in the UN FAO Food Price Index (Chart 2).

The concern over food prices is due to unfavourable supply factors as Malaysia remains a major importer of food and a trickle down effect from continual subsidy-rationalisation efforts by the government. Notwithstanding this, opposing forces, such as a more cautious stance by consumers, the high-base effect and a general slowdown in economic growth, will likely tame the headline inflation number for 2012. Thus, we foresee CPI inflation to be about 2.5% in 2012 following a 3.3% pace in 2011.

Interest rate – on a downward trajectory, naturally

With economic growth set to moderate in 2012, the interest rate bias will likely be on the downside as Bank Negara shifts its focus to prevent any sharp decline in economic activity. Such growth bolstering measures have, to some extent, been undertaken by regional central banks. Indonesia’s central bank, for instance, front loaded its interest rate cut by 75 basis points for fear of a sharp decline in its GDP growth.

Similarly, China’s central bank reduced domestic banks’ reserve requirement ratio in mid-December — the first time in the last three years — and is expected to continue loosening its monetary policy following a drop in export growth to the slowest pace in two years in November and a decline in the growth of money supply to the lowest level in a decade. As for Malaysia, recent remarks by Bank Negara suggest that policymakers are ready to implement measures to support growth, although there are limits to what monetary policy can do and that fiscal measures are needed to provide more impetus to economic growth.

Taking cognisance of the fact that the government’s fiscal side is constrained by the need to keep budget deficits in check, we think that there is a likelihood of Bank Negara undertaking mild accommodative measures to complement the government’s measures to defend the economy from a sharp deterioration in 2012.

At the same time, with inflationary pressures likely to remain benign following softer demand-pull and cost-push factors, lowering interest rates will not likely bring about any adverse repercussions for the general economy. Hence, we think that a 25 to 50 basis point cut in the overnight policy rate (OPR) could be on the cards in 2012, bringing the policy rate down to a range of 2.5% to 2.75%.

Capital flows – something worth watching

Recent statistics on the balance of payments (BoP) raised some eyebrows due to a sizeable amount of net capital outflows in 3Q2011. On the whole, the BoP registered a much smaller surplus of RM10.9 billion, down from RM61.7 billion quarter following net outflows of RM23.3 billion in the financial account, which was largely attributed to equally massive RM23.4 billion net outflows in portfolio investment.

This is hardly surprising as global portfolio managers switched back to the greenback in search of safe haven financial instruments amidst heightening risk aversion.

It is worth highlighting that we deem such a trend in outflows to persist in the near future as international investors continue to move funds into US dollar-denominated assets. The reasons are as follows:

• Any jitters in the financial market will lure asset managers back to the greenback for safe haven purposes;

• Further signs of a steady recovery in the US economy will make Asian economies less appealing on a relative basis as the latter will continue to be confounded by the conflicting aims of containing asset price inflation while supporting economic growth at the same time; and

• Massive amount of inflows into Malaysian Government Securities (MGS) in the past year will mean higher probability of outflows when investors start to rebalance their portfolios in favour of the US market.

Given such a scenario, Asian currencies — the ringgit included — will likely be on a downward trajectory going forward.

Ringgit – to sail through a rough sea due to market volatility

Rising volatility in global exchange rates in recent years has indubitably complicated the task of evaluating the ringgit’s movement. Of all the forces that could influence the ringgit’s movement, possible outflows of portfolio investment are probably the most crucial in determining the trend of the ringgit in the near term.

This is based on the possible reversal in capital flows following a dramatic increase in the percentage of foreign holdings of MGS to total MGS outstanding to an all-time high of 35% in August 2011. Neighbouring Indonesia also experienced massive Inflows into its government debt instruments.

As for the ringgit, judging by the outlook for growth and inflation, interest rate expectations as well as the trend in capital flows, we expect the ringgit to continue hovering above the RM3 level against the US dollar in 2012.

We generally believe that the ringgit will have limited upside against the US dollar due to these reasons that have been generally described: rising flow of funds into US dollar-denominated assets as the US economy continues to emit positive signals; lower growth prospects for the Malaysian economy and Asia in general following the lag effects of the European economic turmoil; and portfolio outflows from Malaysian shores as investors seek to rebalance their positions after being heavily invested in MGS in the past two years. Therefore, we opine that the ringgit will trade mostly in a range of 3.10 to 3.30 against the greenback in 2012.

The government’s financial condition – no qualms about the target

Although the government’s budget deficit target for 2012 of 4.7% of the country’s GDP may seem like a tall order, we think that this is achievable if GDP growth does not fall too drastically in 2012. This confidence is derived from the observation that the projected deficit target is based on relatively low growth in government revenue which we think can be surpassed if the economy does not shrink dramatically in 2012.

Our view is also strengthened by the fact that Malaysia’s tax-to-GDP ratio is one of the highest in the region. Barring any unforeseen need to aggressively expand fiscal policy to support growth and with an increase in the efficiency of revenue collection as well as the government’s cautious expenditure patterns, we opine that the 4.7% deficit target level is well within reach in 2012.

The article is prepared bu the economic team of the Malaysian Rating Corporation Bhd

News Link

Financial Times – Pay gap a $740bn threat to US recovery

December 15, 2011 in Articles, Spotlight

December 14, 2011 | By Robin Harding in Washington

Jonathan Smucker felt so strongly that something was wrong at the heart of the American system that he left the small business he runs in Rhode Island and set off for New York City to take part in the Occupy Wall Street protest.

“Like a lot of Americans, I’m pretty ticked off. It’s not that there are rich people, it’s that the people with a lot of money over the past few decades have rigged the system so that there’s not a fair chance for anyone any more,” he said at the protests last week.

“We are the 99%”, the slogan of Occupy Wall Street, is a reference to the rising wealth of the top 1 per cent of US income distribution. But an equally valid slogan might be: “We get 58%”.

That figure is the share of US national income that goes to workers as wages rather than to investors as profits and interest. It has fallen to its lowest level since records began after the second world war and is part of the reason why incomes at the top – which tend to be earned from capital – have risen so much. If wages were at their postwar average share of 63 per cent, workers would earn an extra $740bn this year, about $5,000 per worker, according to FT calculations.

This so-called labour share has been in gentle decline in most industrial economies, but especially Anglo-Saxon economies, for the last couple of decades. In this recovery, however, something strange and unprecedented is going on.

“Profit margins are not only very high today but [companies’] behaviour has been very unusual,” said Andrew Smithers, who runs the consultancy Smithers & Co in London. Profit margins and returns on capital are the flip side of the labour share.

Historically, the labour share tends to rise during recessions as companies hold on to workers and sacrifice profits, then falls back in a recovery. But during the 2008 recession the labour share did the opposite: it fell, and when the recovery began it kept falling.

“What is absolutely remarkable is that profits in the corporate sector are 25-30 per cent greater than they were before the recession, even though there is substantial unused capacity and high unemployment,” said Lawrence Mishel, president of the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute in Washington.

The decline in the labour share, along with a shift of labour income towards higher earners, may be an important part of why the US economic recovery is so sluggish. Workers on lower wages consume much of their income, while higher wage earners and those with capital income are more likely to save. That will not affect total demand if savers lend to those who want to consume or invest in buildings and start-ups – but investment has been slow to recover in the wake of the recession.

Whether the decline in labour share will reverse on its own, or whether it is wise or even possible to reverse it, depends on why it has fallen. Economists have several theories, though none of them fits perfectly with the facts.

“The two primary drivers are globalisation and technological change,” Peter Orszag, budget director for President Barack Obama from 2009-2010 and now at Citigroup, argued in a recent column.

The globalisation argument is that China’s wholehearted entry into world trade, along with many of its neighbours, led to a huge increase in the global labour supply. A higher supply of labour relative to capital should mean a lower price.

There are several flavours of technological argument, but in a widely cited 2007 Bank for International Settlements paper, Luci Ellis and Kathryn Smith suggested that the rapid pace of change in computing could push down the labour share. As companies replaced their technology more often, they would also increase workforce turnover – and that would reduce the bargaining power of workers.

Lower bargaining power for workers – often tied to the broad decline of unions – is a third factor often blamed for falling labour shares. Mr Mishel says that the decline in labour share “tells you that employers have the upper hand”.

The trouble with all of these arguments, though, is timing. China has been part of the global economy for a couple of decades now and has become a source of capital as well as labour. The IT revolution has been in full swing for at least as long. Unions have been in decline for decades.

The strange behaviour of profits after this recession needs further explanation and Mr Smithers has an innovative idea. “It seems to me that what we’ve seen has been a marked change in corporate behaviour,” he says. “They have not responded by cutting prices and competing like fury, they’ve responded by cutting staff.”

He suggests that the change is linked to the rise of bonus culture and share options for business executives. The average chief executive of an S&P500 company is only in the job for five or six years and their pay is often closely linked to the share price of their corporation or to its returns on equity.

That creates strong incentives to keep profits high in the short term, and Mr Smithers suggests that those incentives have changed how management responds to a recession. Instead of hoarding labour and cutting prices to grab market share, companies are sacking workers, holding prices and choosing to buy back their own equity rather than make new investments.

If Mr Smithers is right, it is hard to see what will break the cycle and restore a higher labour share. His optimistic scenario is that, over time, competition will lead to more hiring and investment. His gloomier alternative is that it will take another severe recession.

Either way, he points out that as governments in the US and UK reduce their fiscal deficits, cash flow to other sectors of the economy will have to fall and consumers are ill-placed to bear any further burden. “Business is going to need to have both rising investment and falling profits,” Mr Smithers argues.

That means the fall in the labour share is not just an important political and economic issue – it is one of vital importance to investors as well. If the fall in the labour share is reversed, either by time or by policy, then the corporate profits that sit on the other side of the scale will have to decline.

Additional reporting by Shannon Bond in New York